Paper Submission Guidelines

Papers should be in English. Previously published work should not be submitted, nor may the work be concurrently submitted to any other conference or journal. Such papers will be rejected without review.

• The paper is to be submitted at two links.
o Authors have to register in Microsoft CMT before submission. After that submit the paper in Microsoft CMT: https://cmt3.research.microsoft.com/RASET2023

o The paper is also needed to be submitted to link of Plagiarism link: https://forms.gle/P1yAJA2XnRgSzCrLA

• All the articles will be checked for plagiarism by iThenticate. Plagiarism should be less than 15%.
• A double-blind peer review will be carried out for review of every article.
• The conference registration is mandatory for at least one of the authors and should be done before the deadline.
• All accepted high-quality papers will be will be published in a Scopus indexed Taylor & Francis conference proceedings as book volume. Publisher will conduct quality checks on the accepted papers and only papers that pass these checks will be published. Check conference website for more details.
• Short papers (Work-in-Progress) are an opportunity to present preliminary or interim results. The paper length should be up to 6 pages.
• Literature reviews/survey papers will only be considered if they present a new perspective or benefit the field.

Account Details for Registration

Account Name: Cummins College Of Engineering for Women
Bank: Axis Bank Ltd Branch: Hingna, Nagpur
A/c No.: 911010044631194
IFSC Code: UTIB0001239
Branch Code: 001239
MICR Code: 440211009

o Registration payment information is available on conference website.
o Proof of Payment Submission link: https://forms.gle/gyV8Jr1s3vUD1zuE9
o Payment towards registration should be made through online transfer. After the payment of Registration fees, authors are requested to fill the online registration form in order to complete the registration.
o If number of pages in manuscript exceeds 6 pages, 1000 INR will be charged per

Prospective authors are kindly invited to submit full papers that include the following:

Metadata – title, keywords, abstract, professional affiliation(s), and cited references in the bibliography must be included, and written in the English Language.
Abstract – a brief and objective summary that previews the rest of the paper it describes. It should be concise enough to facilitate a decision on whether the entire paper could be read with profit.
Introduction – an introductory statement of the purpose of the paper, usually describing the hypothesis that will be tested and a summary of related previous work by others.
Methods – the methods that are used to test the hypothesis should be given in sufficient detail that another researcher in the field could duplicate the testing.
Results and Discussion – the hypothesis should be tested and data representing the results of the testing presented.
Conclusion – the data should be discussed and the results interpreted, and conclusions given.

Academics and Research Work Ethics

Papers submitted to the conference should report your original work, unpublished before. They could be either experimental or theoretical and must not be under consideration for publication elsewhere. We firmly believe that ethical conduct is the most essential virtue of any academics. Any act of plagiarism or self-plagiarism is unacceptable and academic misconduct will not be tolerated. If an author is found to commit an act of plagiarism, we will reject the article submitted or delete the article from the final publications. Fabrication of data is an egregious departure from the expected norms of scientific conduct, as is the selective reporting of data with the intent to mislead or deceive, as well as the theft of data or research results from others.

All the articles will be checked for plagiarism by iThenticate. Plagiarism should be less than 15%.

Reviewing process

A preliminary review was conducted by conference editors to make sure all papers are included in the scope of this conference, if not, the submission will be rejected or suggested to other applicable conferences. The author names, emails and affiliationswere removed constantly when they are sent to conference committee members (reviewers) for peer-review.

While reviewing Originality, Repetition, Content and Conclusion will be reviewed.
Each reviewer will be asked to fill in the reviewing form and 9 criteria in total are to be scored (Y/N) with comments.
1. Is the article well drafted and sound in terms of language?
2. Is the area of research relevant?
3. Does the article emphasize on relevant technical know-how in the identified area of research?
4. Does the article identify research issues and/or provide appropriate solution?
5. Relevance and clarity of drawings, graphs and tables
6. Appropriateness of abstract as a description of the paper
7. Reference list are recent one, adequate and correctly cited
8. Based on Reviewer Recommendation in terms of (1. Strong Accept 2. Accept 3. Weak Accept 4. Reject), the decision will be made. When it is marked by Revision, we will have a double check of the revised papers before acceptation.
9. Comments to the Author (if any, specially for paper revision)